Interpreting Asymmetries of Projection in Children’s Inductive Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Children’s Attention to Property Likelihood as a Guide to Property Projection
Induction is a fundamentally important cognitive process. The standard method for studying induction isolates specific effects of interest by controlling for the variability inherent to many features of an inductive problem. For instance, it is common to supply evidence about stable properties and ask participants to generalize these properties to a range of targets. The present study examined ...
متن کاملThe Impact of Statistical Training on Children's Inductive Reasoning
Regardless of age there are mixed findings concerning the extent to which individuals utilize statistical features of input to make inductive inferences. Direct instruction seems to be one important factor in linking one’s understanding of statistical properties with their reasoning. In the present study we examined the extent to which explicit training on some statistical principles would infl...
متن کاملWhen a Word is Worth a Thousand Pictures: A Connectionist Account of the Percept to Label Shift in Children’s Reasoning
We present a connectionist model of children’s developing reliance on object labels as opposed to superficial appearance when making inductive inferences. The model learns to infer a fact about an object based on the object’s label (and not percept) even though that fact has never been previously associated with the label. The shift in reliance from perceptual to label information is found to d...
متن کاملEntailment, Duality, and the Forms of Reasoning
We explore the notion of duality for defeasible entailment relations induced by preference orderings on states. We then show that such preferential entailment relations may be used to characterise Peircean inductive and abductive reasoning. Interpreting the preference relations as accessibility relations establishes modular Gödel-Löb logic as the modal logic of inductive and abductive reasoning. §
متن کاملEvidential diversity and premise probability in young children's inductive judgment
A familiar adage in the philosophy of science is that general hypotheses are better supported by varied evidence than by uniform evidence. Several studies suggest that young children do not respect this principle, and thus suffer from a defect in their inductive methodology. We argue that the diversity principle does not have the normative status that psychologists attribute to it, and should b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006